Myspace Layouts | Remortgages | Personal Loans | Ringtones | SanDisk Flash Memory Card
BCS considering way to make more teams eligible [Archive] - Aggiefans.com

PDA

View Full Version : BCS considering way to make more teams eligible


TwelfthAG
04-23-2006, 03:37 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2418838&campaign=rss&source=NCFHeadlines
NEW YORK -- Becoming eligible for the Bowl Championship Series might be easier this season.

With the BCS expanding to five games, college football officials will consider increasing the number of teams eligible for at-large bids. To do so, they'll have to lower the standards a bit.

In the past a team needed nine wins and a top-12 ranking in the final BCS standings to be in the running for an at-large bid to the best paying bowl games.

"One thing we will discuss is whether or not the pool of eligible at-large teams should be increased, given the additional two slots with the fifth bowl," new BCS coordinator Mike Slive said. "I'm not saying we will or we won't. There will be discussion and I anticipate a decision will be made and recommended."

Slive, the Southeastern Conference commissioner, and the rest of the Division I-A conference commissioners that make up the BCS braintrust begin four days of meetings in Phoenix on Monday. For the first time in three years, they'll gather with no major changes needing to be made to the system used to crown a major college football champion.

Two years ago the BCS simplified its standings formula, emphasizing the polls over the computers. Last season the formula stayed the same, but a new poll was created to replace The Associated Press Top 25. The Harris Interactive poll, voted on by former college football players, coaches and administrators, plus some media members, took the place of the AP poll.

The status quo will be in effect this season.

"We anticipate that the BCS standings will again be made up of the Harris poll, the coaches' poll and the computers," Slive said.

Last season, after two straight years filled with controversy, everything fell into place nicely for the BCS.

Southern California and Texas were the undisputed top two teams in the country, and both were undefeated when they played in the Rose Bowl for the national title. The Longhorns knocked off the defending champion Trojans in a game that will go down as one of the best in college football history.

The decision to add a fifth big-dollar game was made in 2004, with BCS officials feeling pressure to provide greater access to teams outside the six conferences with automatic bids.

The BCS championship game will now be played a week after the four other marquee games at the site of either the Rose, Sugar, Fiesta or Orange bowls.

The Fiesta Bowl gets the first shot at double hosting. Fiesta Bowl officials will be part of the BCS meetings this week.

"So there are several format and administrative issues that are not necessarily newsworthy, but that will take some time and some thought and some consideration," Slive said.

Representatives from Fox, the new television home of the BCS, will also be on hand.

Fox takes over for ABC after signing a four-year deal worth $320 million for the broadcast rights to the Fiesta, Orange and Sugar bowls from 2007-10 and the national title game from 2007-09.

The Rose Bowl, which negotiates its own TV deal, will still be on ABC.

Fox is in charge of naming the new championship game and finding a sponsor.

"It doesn't do me any good to speculate," Slive said when asked about possible sponsors.

The Sugar Bowl has a new sponsor this year -- AllState Insurance replaces Nokia -- and should be back in its old home.

The Sugar Bowl made a temporary move to Atlanta last season after being forced out of New Orleans by Hurricane Katrina. The Sugar Bowl is expected to return to the Superdome this season.

"The Saints expect to play there so we think by the time the Sugar Bowl comes there won't be an issues," Slive said. "We're really looking forward to getting back to New Orleans."

Loftin
04-23-2006, 10:25 PM
So I wonder which bowl will become the 5th BCS game? Cotton? Gator? Or will a new bowl be made?

CaliHornia
04-23-2006, 10:28 PM
That's what I was wondering. There's no real obvious bowl out there in the hierarchy. The cotton bowl isn't going to get that notoriety until they fix up that stadium.

What the CB has going for it is that it's not in Florida, which is already home to one bowl.

What it has against it apart from the stadium is that the weather can suck in early January and generally I think the NCAA would rather not have that.

Aren't the Gator and the Citrus Bowl on par with each other?

Loftin
04-23-2006, 10:35 PM
True, crappy facilities will make it impossible for the Cotton Bowl to join the BCS. However, I'm not sure what you're talking about with the weather. I was at the A&M-UT Cotton Bowl, and the weather was about 65-70 degrees with a slight breeze. There was a misty rain before the game but no problems during.

CaliHornia
04-23-2006, 10:43 PM
It's been cold many years. I remember you guys played Florida State there one year and the weather sucked. And it's sucked many times before.

You've got about a 40% chance of bad weather in Dallas in January and that's too high.

In Florida, California and Arizona they're practically guaranteed great weather.

In a dome they are guaranteed great weather.

jagowar
04-23-2006, 10:49 PM
isnt dallas getting that new insano stadium? i also think its able to be covered (like reliant).

texag005
04-24-2006, 10:34 AM
Yeah there has been lots of discussion about moving the Cotton Bowl to the new stadium, but it's not supposed to be done until like 2010 i think. It's supposed to be in the same fashion as reliant I believe with a retractable roof and something like seating that can be expanded up to like 70-80 thousand for football games I think.

Loftin
04-24-2006, 11:20 AM
Maybe the Peach Bowl in Georgia is a possibility.

Slotback
04-24-2006, 01:11 PM
Playoffs anyone?

adamrod
04-24-2006, 01:18 PM
I understood to article to say that there will not be an extra physical location added. It sounds to me like they're going to play the Sugar, Rose, Orange, and Fiesta bowls January 1st/2nd and then have the national championship game at the Fiesta Bowl January 8th so that two BCS games take place at the same stadium each year. Did anyone else read it that way?

Vlyrock
04-24-2006, 01:19 PM
I'm still torn on the playoffs issue. Look at the NCAA tournament as a good example as to why.

Was George Mason really a top 4 team that deserved to be in the Final 4? They beat good teams and got hot at the right time, but I wouldn't put them in the Top 20 of all the teams in the tourney (if even that high)....

UConn or North Carolina deserved the bid based on their season -- (which is way more important in college football) -- but one bad game took that away. In college football, one could consider the regular season as a playoff too...since a loss essentially eliminates you from the championship game.

Slotback
04-24-2006, 01:21 PM
I just don't like the BCS system.

Vlyrock
04-24-2006, 01:23 PM
I just don't like the BCS system.
I don't either. :D

TomballAg
04-24-2006, 01:40 PM
I'm still torn on the playoffs issue. Look at the NCAA tournament as a good example as to why.

That's why I love the NCAA basketball tourney. George Mason won the games on the court, they weren't picked by a sports writer, coach or computer geek.

Loftin
04-24-2006, 02:56 PM
That's why I love the NCAA basketball tourney. George Mason won the games on the court, they weren't picked by a sports writer, coach or computer geek.

Exactly. They beat Michigan State, North Carolina, Wichita State and UConn to get to the Final Four. They deserved to be there the most, considering the wins they needed to get there.