View Full Version : What Tf?
SHAG69
10-12-2007, 07:34 PM
"When spouting out his overall record, the "anti-Fran" crowd is quick to point out his abysmal record vs Texas Tech, OU and Texas (2-10). A win Saturday will go a long way to prove that A&M is headed in the right direction under Coach Fran."
Vly
How can any Aggie not be an "anti-Fran" person. The man has embarrassed the University (maybe beyond any immediate relief). A win Saturday used to be a given against Tech, with Fran not so. I can't believe Tech has dominated us so much lately.
Put down the crack pipe, your pipe, and stop the acid. THERE IS NO RIGHT DIRECTION WITH COACH FRAN.
Vlyrock
10-12-2007, 07:38 PM
I'd argue, but you must be the one smoking something:
A win Saturday used to be a given against Tech, with Fran not so. I can't believe Tech has dominated us so much lately.
A&M hasn't won in Lubbock since 1993. Fran got here in 2003. Game. Set. Match. And to pile on -- winning cures all.
The article wasn't written to defend Fran. It was just written explaining how important this game is in his quest to keep his job.
SHAG69
10-12-2007, 07:44 PM
Since I am not 20 something... Please pull the A&M record since I was born in 1960 to understand. A&M life did not begin in 2003? Skirmish, Battle, War. Fran's McKenzie got fired you and Big John should apply.
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 07:45 PM
Since I am not 20 something... Please pull the A&M record since I was born in 1960 to understand. A&M life did not begin in 2003? Skirmish, Battle, War. Fran's McKenzie got fired you and Big John should apply.
If you dont' like the owner and mods oand apparently the what is posted on this site, why do you continue to post here?
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 07:51 PM
And by the way, Army and Navy used to be college powerhouses and national title contenders. If you go back far enough, you can make your claims for a lot of teams.
Hell, Cougar High even used to be a power in the SWC. :laugh:
SHAG69
10-12-2007, 07:53 PM
If you dont' like the owner and mods oand apparently the what is posted on this site, why do you continue to post here?
Hit a nerve? too close to home? Big John? How you extrapolated me not liking the mods from my comment I do not know. My field is psychology not yours. Stick to whatever you do. I feel the commentary should be unbiased that's all. I post here because I want to and I will continue. Vly's commentary was unrealistic in my humble opinion. Fran is wrong for A&M. And winning will NOT solve all problems. Fran's conduct is reprehensible and unmoral. I know, it's tough to swallow.
GuatemalanAg
10-12-2007, 07:54 PM
Fran is turning Aggies against Aggies...He is the Aggie "anti-Christ" :wow:
SHAG69
10-12-2007, 07:55 PM
And by the way, Army and Navy used to be college powerhouses and national title contenders. If you go back far enough, you can make your claims for a lot of teams.
Hell, Cougar High even used to be a power in the SWC. :laugh:
Look, We are talking about A&M against Tech. Not Army and Navy. Please stay on topic.
The Massacre
10-12-2007, 07:56 PM
i would be willing to bet that A&M only holds a small edge in the overall series with tech. i don't think wins have been a given in the past.
that being said, i bet fran couldn't beat himself in a game of pocket pool.
SHAG69
10-12-2007, 07:56 PM
Fran is turning Aggies against Aggies...He is the Aggie "anti-Christ" :wow:
Only some of the posters are Aggies.
SHAG69
10-12-2007, 07:57 PM
i would be willing to bet that A&M only holds a small edge in the overall series with tech. i don't think wins have been a given in the past.
that being said, i bet fran couldn't beat himself in a game of pocket pool.
:rep::rep::rep::rep:
The Massacre
10-12-2007, 07:57 PM
that being said, i hope the Aggies win out, win the Big 12 champ. game, go to a BCS game and win that and BB still fires fran. that would be my ideal situation.
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 07:58 PM
Hit a nerve? too close to home? Big John? How you extrapolated me not liking the mods from my comment I do not know. My field is psychology not yours. Stick to whatever you do. I feel the commentary should be unbiased that's all. I post here because I want to and I will continue. Vly's commentary was unrealistic in my humble opinion. Fran is wrong for A&M. And winning will NOT solve all problems. Fran's conduct is reprehensible and unmoral. I know, it's tough to swallow.
I don't care if you make commentary about Fran or A&M vs. Tech, but the weak potshots you try to take at myself and Vly why I asked that question.
You have made it extremely clear your goal to make sure everyone you come across knows you hate Fran and you want him gone and you are willing to take shots at people who disagree with you.
Vlyrock
10-12-2007, 08:00 PM
What's funny is nobody's come out (including me and BigJohn) that said we disagree with Shag69. We're just not as hell bent in telling the world our thoughts and feelings...
CoolaidWade
10-12-2007, 08:00 PM
This bickering does sucks ass. It's not really going to solve anything either but apparently is not going to stop until he is gone. I think we may have crept over that percentage of Aggie Fans (and more importantly monetary supporters) who want him gone that he may actually be gone.
The Massacre
10-12-2007, 08:01 PM
What's funny is nobody's come out (including me and BigJohn) that said we disagree with Shag69. We're just not as hell bent in telling the world our thoughts and feelings...
i just go with both sides. that way i have each angle covered. bitch about people bashing fran and then turn around and get some shots in myself. some might call that hypocritical, i call it thorough. :cool:
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 08:01 PM
Since I am not 20 something... Please pull the A&M record since I was born in 1960 to understand.
Since its hard for you to follow in your old age, being born so far back in the last century, I've quoted the relevant part. :laugh:
Vlyrock
10-12-2007, 08:02 PM
Since I am not 20 something... Please pull the A&M record since I was born in 1960 to understand. A&M life did not begin in 2003? Skirmish, Battle, War. Fran's McKenzie got fired you and Big John should apply.
Shag, you're right -- you're not 20 years old. Your memory must be fading along with the age.
I went ahead and calculated (and enlarged) the numbers for you...
The series of A&M vs Texas Tech since 1960:
20-26-1 (Tech leads by 6 games)
A&M led the series in 1963 at 2-1-1 and then never led again. They tied it in 1994 at 17-17-1, but never took the lead in the head-to-head since 1960.
So, please refresh my memory when games versus Tech were sure wins...
And yes, the shots at myself and John are getting annoying (and old).
The Massacre
10-12-2007, 08:03 PM
are you sure it's not A&M 26-20-1?
GuatemalanAg
10-12-2007, 08:04 PM
:popcorn:
Vlyrock
10-12-2007, 08:05 PM
Here's the spreadsheet I just made going back to 1960 and reviewing the w/l's..... (count them for yourself if you want)
2006L
2005L
2004W
2003L
2002L
2001L
2000W
1999L
1998W
1997L
1996L
1995L
1994W
1993W
1992W
1991W
1990W
1989L
1988W
1987L
1986W
1985W
1984L
1983L
1982L
1981W
1980W
1979L
1978W
1977W
1976L
1975W
1974W
1973L
1972L
1971L
1970L
1969L
1968L
1967W
1966W
1965L
1964L
1963L
1962W
1961W
1960T
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 08:05 PM
I'm not a fan of bashing a current coach or calling for his head during the season. I think is fairly clear that unless Fran wins big this year (and maybe even regardless), he's pretty much done. But NOTHING is gonna happen till after the season and contining to moan and bitch about the coach does nothing except bring a negative feeling around the team the same people claim to support.
SHAG69
10-12-2007, 08:06 PM
Big John,
Why, that sounds like the pot calling the kettle black. In my sick way, that is what I have been trying to say. You and Vly always appear to be willing to fall on the sword for Fran. And almost anytime anyone posts anything different you rag them or strongly disagree. Now, that being said, I only log on sporadically. And I have observed this..what do other people think? I'm sure I have made a mistake, H*ll, I'm 47 years old.
I also expected to be banned for expressing my opinions. But, I have not taken any potshots at anyone. I just am plainspoken and call a spade a spade, owner or no owner.
SHAG69
10-12-2007, 08:08 PM
This bickering does sucks ass. It's not really going to solve anything either but apparently is not going to stop until he is gone. I think we may have crept over that percentage of Aggie Fans (and more importantly monetary supporters) who want him gone that he may actually be gone.
Thanks for the support. "he" has spoken.
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 08:10 PM
Big John,
Why, that sounds like the pot calling the kettle black. In my sick way, that is what I have been trying to say. You and Vly always appear to be willing to fall on the sword for Fran. And almost anytime anyone posts anything different you rag them or strongly disagree. Now, that being said, I only log on sporadically. And I have observed this..what do other people think? I'm sure I have made a mistake, H*ll, I'm 47 years old.
I also expected to be banned for expressing my opinions. But, I have not taken any potshots at anyone. I just am plainspoken and call a spade a spade, owner or no owner.
I really don't follow with the "pot calling the kettle black" comment. :huh:
I can't speak for Vly on this, but like I posted above, I just don't think its proper and worth the effort to constantly dog your coach while the season is still going on. It only bring down the team and program at the same time that you (a general you, not you specifically) are screaming for the team to win.
With any large group of people, such as a fan base, there will always be people who take a position opposite of you. A&M is no exception. No matter how bad Fran gets I am sure we could find people who would support him. That part is human nature.
I also agree with Vly. While I don't like what Fran has done at A&M so far our problems with tceh started long before he got here. And he's right about another thing: Winning does cure all.
Vlyrock
10-12-2007, 08:13 PM
Big John,
Why, that sounds like the pot calling the kettle black. In my sick way, that is what I have been trying to say. You and Vly always appear to be willing to fall on the sword for Fran. And almost anytime anyone posts anything different you rag them or strongly disagree. Now, that being said, I only log on sporadically. And I have observed this..what do other people think? I'm sure I have made a mistake, H*ll, I'm 47 years old.
I also expected to be banned for expressing my opinions. But, I have not taken any potshots at anyone. I just am plainspoken and call a spade a spade, owner or no owner.
1) John and I are separate people. He has his thoughts and beliefs... I have mine. So, please quit lumping us together.
2) I've never been willing to "fall on the sword" for Fran. I've never publicly cried to fire him and have explained several times why (it doesn't solve anything). With that said, I still run an Aggie website -- and when an A&M article needs to be written, sometimes that involves writing about the coach and what he's going through -- get over it.
3) Nobody will ban you for having an opinion. As long as you stay within the forum rules, you can disagree with me on everything.
4) I rag on people for all sorts of things. If you have been reading the forums, you'll see it all the time from Dustin, Whitey, Gravy, Massacre and more. I do it on several threads (many which have nothing to do with Fran). I'm just "the moderator" so people take my joking a little more seriously.
Anything else?
The Massacre
10-12-2007, 08:16 PM
Here's the spreadsheet I just made going back to 1960 and reviewing the w/l's..... (count them for yourself if you want)
2006L
2005L
2004W
2003L
2002L
2001L
2000W
1999L
1998W
1997L
1996L
1995L
1994W
1993W
1992W
1991W
1990W
1989L
1988W
1987L
1986W
1985W
1984L
1983L
1982L
1981W
1980W
1979L
1978W
1977W
1976L
1975W
1974W
1973L
1972L
1971L
1970L
1969L
1968L
1967W
1966W
1965L
1964L
1963L
1962W
1961W
1960T
i think i counted 21 wins on that list. :spy:
and i wasn't challenging your counting ability. just the compilation of the spread sheet, i guess.
Vlyrock
10-12-2007, 08:18 PM
You're right, I didn't count the 1967 W, that made us 4-4-1 at the time...another point we tied but never took the lead. I guess that means we took a 1 game lead in 1994 though. Still losing the series though.
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 08:19 PM
3) Nobody will ban you for having an opinion. As long as you stay within the forum rules, you can disagree with me on everything.
I mean really. We (the mods) let Boozin continue to come back until he finally hung himself. Why would we ban someone who we know is a decent enough guy?:cool:
The Massacre
10-12-2007, 08:20 PM
spite? :laugh:
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 08:20 PM
You're right, I didn't count the 1967 W, that made us 4-4-1 at the time...another point we tied but never took the lead. I guess that means we took a 1 game lead in 1994 though. Still losing the series though.
An accountant who can't count. Now that takes the cake :laugh: :laugh:
SHAG69
10-12-2007, 08:23 PM
I started a good thread, No? Seriously, I am really sick about what I am hearing on the news. And, yes, Vly, your commentary, though well written, hit a BIG nerve. Vly and Big John, please accept my sincere apology. You both have never done anything to me. And I am sorry for "my bad mood" on the website. It really serves as a "therapy" for me to vent.
I will stay within the guidelines. Sorry Coolaide, did not mean to offend you either. Mole, thanks for the reality check.
Hope all is cool.:gig:
Vlyrock
10-12-2007, 08:26 PM
:cool: I'm not an accountant! I'm a software support consultant with a degree and master's in Accounting.
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 08:30 PM
shag is a good poster
SHAG69
10-12-2007, 08:31 PM
shag is a good poster
Thanks dude.:rep::rep::rep:
polish
10-12-2007, 08:38 PM
shag is a good poster
How?
His original post said basically if you don't agree with me, your not an Aggie. Very immature
His facts were wrong we haven't dominated Tech over the time period specified. Using emotion over facts isn't what good posters do.
Please explain :bored:
SHAG69
10-12-2007, 08:59 PM
How?
His original post said basically if you don't agree with me, your not an Aggie. Very immature
His facts were wrong we haven't dominated Tech over the time period specified. Using emotion over facts isn't what good posters do.
Please explain :bored:
1) Your supposition of me statement that if you don't agree with me you're not an aggie is false. And please tell me you are not an English major at A&M.
2) You hardly seem qualified to judge who is immature.
3) I did not state ANY facts. I stated that it seems odd that we worry about tech. DURING my adolescence and young adult hood it appeared that we did not.
4) You of all people do not know what "good posters" do.
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:04 PM
How?
His original post said basically if you don't agree with me, your not an Aggie. Very immature
His facts were wrong we haven't dominated Tech over the time period specified. Using emotion over facts isn't what good posters do.
Please explain :bored:
The last month has been me and others that had seen the light being told if we didn't support Fran then we weren't Aggies.
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 09:29 PM
The last month has been me and others that had seen the light being told if we didn't support Fran then we weren't Aggies.
Who in the world said that?? I've never seen anything like that posted since I've been here.
polish
10-12-2007, 09:30 PM
1) Your supposition of me statement that if you don't agree with me you're not an aggie is false. And please tell me you are not an English major at A&M.
[quote]How can any Aggie not be an "anti-Fran" person.
Aggie and anti-fran being bolded dicates that there is a direct relationship. How about being mature and sticking of the discussion of facts and instead of attacking something I typed in 5 seconds.
2) You hardly seem qualified to judge who is immature.
Really please explain and not make blanket accussions of my character. I said your statement was immature, I didn't talk about you personally
3) I did not state ANY facts. I stated that it seems odd that we worry about tech. DURING my adolescence and young adult hood it appeared that we did not.
A win Saturday used to be a given against Tech, with Fran not so.
You stated that as a fact.
4) You of all people do not know what "good posters" do.
Again attacking me. I said good posters use facts, your making blanket accusations. I gave a reason why I felt the way I feel.
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:31 PM
You're kidding right?
polish
10-12-2007, 09:32 PM
The last month has been me and others that had seen the light being told if we didn't support Fran then we weren't Aggies.
Please show me a link
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:35 PM
I'm not going to go through the effort. It's common knowledge. Me and countless others have said that we supported the team but not fran only to be berated by everyone else and questioned how good of an aggie we were. And every post I make somehow gets twisted into being negative about the team somehow. If you read the boards it's not hard to know this.
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 09:37 PM
You're kidding right?
No, I'm serious. I've seen people imply that if you still support coach fran you aren't an Aggie, but I've never seen anyone outright say, or even vaguely imply that not supporting him makes you not an Aggie, especially not in the past month.
I'd really like to see a link.
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 09:37 PM
I'm not going to go through the effort. It's common knowledge. Me and countless others have said that we supported the team but not fran only to be berated by everyone else and questioned how good of an aggie we were. And every post I make somehow gets twisted into being negative about the team somehow. If you read the boards it's not hard to know this.
Wow, the classic victimization stance. :bored:
It doesn't matter. One man's treason is another man's fight for independence. The point is we all have different views on Fran. People's opinions don't make them less of an Aggie because at the end of the day we all bleed maroon and want A&M to be the best at everything, we just have different views on how to get there.
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:39 PM
No, I'm serious. I've seen people imply that if you still support coach fran you aren't an Aggie, but I've never seen anyone outright say, or even vaguely imply that not supporting him makes you not an Aggie, especially not in the past month.
I'd really like to see a link.
No one has outright said it. This was in response to whoever's post up there that said that shag is saying if you don't hate fran your not a good aggie. It's been just the opposite for the last month
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 09:39 PM
It doesn't matter. One man's treason is another man's fight for independence. The point is we all have different views on Fran. People's opinions don't make them less of an Aggie because at the end of the day we all bleed maroon and want A&M to be the best at everything, we just have different views on how to get there.
I'll drink a beer to that. :cheers:
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:39 PM
Wow, the classic victimization stance. :bored:
And you go with the communism stance
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 09:41 PM
And you go with the communism stance
Communism??
What you talking 'bout Willis? :huh:
polish
10-12-2007, 09:41 PM
No one has outright said it.
Then i guess your making assumptions, which you shouldn't do. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they don't consider you an aggie
I'll drink a beer to that. :cheers:
Sounds good to me. I'm already 6 ahead of you. :)
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:42 PM
Then i guess your making assumptions, which you shouldn't do. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they don't consider you an aggie
This was in response to your assumption
Then i guess your making assumptions, which you shouldn't do. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they don't consider you an aggie
And we all know what happens when you make assumptions. You make and an a$$ out of U and umption.
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:43 PM
How?
His original post said basically if you don't agree with me, your not an Aggie. Very immature
His facts were wrong we haven't dominated Tech over the time period specified. Using emotion over facts isn't what good posters do.
Please explain :bored:
This was your post... an assumption. My rebuttal was based on what the tone has been for the past month.
polish
10-12-2007, 09:44 PM
And you go with the communism stance
Um no he meant ( I assume) your acting like the man is always holding you down, like the oppressed minority
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:44 PM
Um no he meant ( I assume) your acting like the man is always holding you down, like the oppressed minority
I am an oppressed minority.
I thought the communism stance ment that if the disagree with the establishment (Aggiefans.com) you are silenced, like in communism.
polish
10-12-2007, 09:47 PM
I am an oppressed minority.
Link? Or are you making an assumption?
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:48 PM
I thought the communism stance ment that if the disagree with the establishment (Aggiefans.com) you are silenced, like in communism.
correct
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:48 PM
Link? Or are you making an assumption?
Mexicans are oppressed every day. What kind of link do you want?
The Massacre
10-12-2007, 09:48 PM
imagine that... someone showed up and this thread really went to crap. obv.
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 09:50 PM
Some of you guys should stroll over to Texags if you want an idea of a communist-state forum :stupid:
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:50 PM
Yeah and all I did was agree with someone and I get ripped... who woulda thunk it?
imagine that... someone showed up and this thread really went to crap. obv.
hey what did I do?:mad: ;)
Unless you were really talking about me and then:mad:
j/k;)
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 09:51 PM
Mexicans are oppressed every day. What kind of link do you want?
SA, I'm Mexican too (well, half). Most of my family lives in the Valley. We probably have cousins who know each other. :laugh:
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:52 PM
what line are you? I'm a garza and a flores
polish
10-12-2007, 09:53 PM
Mexicans are oppressed every day. What kind of link do you want?
wow you went race card
What does have to do with your opinion. Do I disagree with loftin cause he's white. Do a think dustin is a conspiracy theorist because he is white, answer no.
We are talking about opinions and you can't provide anything to back what you said about being told you weren't an aggie. Your trying to step around the issue by bringing up random stuff.
I'm through with this argument. Thanks and gig'em
BigJohn
10-12-2007, 09:53 PM
My mother's side is Gomez. Lots and lots of Gomez.
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:56 PM
wow you went race card
What does have to do with your opinion. Do I disagree with loftin cause he's white. Do a think dustin is a conspiracy theorist because he is white, answer no.
We are talking about opinions and you can't provide anything to back what you said about being told you weren't an aggie. Your trying to step around the issue by bringing up random stuff.
I'm through with this argument. Thanks and gig'em
I now know not to try and have an educated conversation with you.
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 09:57 PM
My mother's side is Gomez. Lots and lots of Gomez.
My favorite mexican restaraunt is called Gomez's!:wow:
GSZ94
10-12-2007, 10:06 PM
:popcorn:
whitelightnin_23
10-12-2007, 10:46 PM
hey...this thread reminds me I need to mow my grass...
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 10:49 PM
btw the shorter days associated with the time of year will make your grass start to go dormant so even if it is browning doesn't mean you need to water it more.... just an fyi
whitelightnin_23
10-12-2007, 10:51 PM
gracias amigo!
Superaggie79
10-12-2007, 10:54 PM
they have an ag that does a lawncare segment on the zone here in Austin and he talked about this last week because it's warm but people are starting to see their grass go dormant. The only caveat (sp?) to that is that if you have a brown "spot" then it's fungus and needs to be killed or it'll still be there in the spring next year.
SHAG69
10-13-2007, 01:01 PM
I'm not going to go through the effort. It's common knowledge. Me and countless others have said that we supported the team but not fran only to be berated by everyone else and questioned how good of an aggie we were. And every post I make somehow gets twisted into being negative about the team somehow. If you read the boards it's not hard to know this.
You're assessment sums up what I have been trying to say. Unfortunately, Big John and Vly, and others disagree. I commented/pot-shoted the above two because they "rule the roost" on AggieFans and seem to respond more frequently when someone dissents. Like I said, I apologize for my conduct. But you're post Superaggie79 makes me feel like I am still in touch with reality and not off-base. Thanks.:rep::rep::rep:
Superaggie79
10-13-2007, 01:03 PM
I do what I can
http://www.aggiefans.com/forums/gallery/file.php?n=256
Superaggie79
10-13-2007, 01:05 PM
What Tf? (http://www.aggiefans.com/forums/showthread.php?p=267484#post267484)10-12-2007 10:54 PMpolish (http://www.aggiefans.com/forums/member.php?u=18)don't make baseless accusations
And neg rep back to you. And the post you neg repped me didn't even have any type of "accusation"
Mezentius
10-13-2007, 01:11 PM
I just mowed by grass come into read some ****e before game day and I come upon this...the absolute silliest thread in a week full of silly threads.
Vlyrock
10-13-2007, 01:55 PM
Locking because it's done...
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.