View Full Version : Holy Crap...Britney is bald!
hmiles619
02-17-2007, 04:07 AM
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=entertainment&id=5042740
Thisjeffguy07
02-17-2007, 04:17 AM
she used to be hot :wow:
dre1222
02-17-2007, 09:06 AM
Yeah, 5 years ago.
Curly06
02-17-2007, 10:22 AM
:throwup:
CaliHornia
02-17-2007, 10:24 AM
she used to be hot :wow:
It's probably one of the biggest wastes in the history of Hollywood. Not talented (at least not as far as I'm concerned) but hot enough to go very, very far.
Dustin00whoop
02-17-2007, 10:44 AM
She is way out there. I think that someone saw her coochie pics, told her to shave it & she got all confused. :drool:
Superaggie79
02-17-2007, 10:51 AM
it already was shaved:bored:
Dustin00whoop
02-17-2007, 10:53 AM
it already was shaved:bored:
Play along with the joke, damnit!
Vlyrock
02-17-2007, 10:54 AM
That's not hot. :sad:
Slotback
02-17-2007, 12:41 PM
Who cares anyway?
macduff93
02-17-2007, 01:34 PM
More tattoos.....hmmmmm. I guess the idea of screwing up and/or losing her kids doesn't really bother her. :bored:
Those of you here with kids know how screwed up and selfish a person must be to not cherish all time available with the ankle biters.
BAGGIO
02-17-2007, 02:22 PM
i'd still hit it... just to say i did
whitelightnin_23
02-17-2007, 03:21 PM
I was thinking BS on this one...but it looks legit & looks like she has some serious mental problems (just further confirmation)...
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20012207_20012195,00.html
Britney Spears checked into a rehab facility and then abruptly checked out, a source confirms to PEOPLE. And then on Friday, she returned to Southern California – and she shaved her head completely bald.
When the tattoo was done, police cleared the way for Spears, who was wearing a hood, to get into her waiting sport utility vehicle.
"She looks like she's having an issue right now," Derrik Snell told the station.
Emily Wynne Hughes, who works at the tattoo parlor, said Spears appeared "distraught and disturbed.
"She was very scatterbrained," she said.
Hughes said that when someone asked the singer and mother of two why her head was shaved, Spears replied: "I don't want anyone touching me. I'm tired of everybody touching me."
Hughes said Spears was a difficult subject for the tattoo artist to work with.
"She was screaming and flipping out from the pain and wiggling her body all around," Hughes said.
Pics here:
http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2007/startracks/070226/britney_bald300.jpg
http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2007/startracks/070226/britney_bald4_300.jpg
http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2007/startracks/070226/britney_bald3_400.jpg
Supposedly there's a video out there...(can't find right now).
Here's a link to a site w/ the video (not sure how long it will be up though):
http://www.x17online.com/
Superaggie79
02-17-2007, 03:27 PM
hawt
whitelightnin_23
02-17-2007, 03:29 PM
i'd still hit it... just to say i did
bet you wouldn't now...those pics made me want to puke...:throwup::throwup::throwup:
The Massacre
02-17-2007, 03:30 PM
dam, she looks like **** in this pic. what a waste of a perfectly good piece of tail (a few years back that is). sad to see people just self-destruct, especially when that person used to be a hot beeeeyotch.
http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2007/startracks/070226/britney_bald4_300.jpg
BAGGIO
02-17-2007, 03:38 PM
ahhh i wish she could say 16 forever. Yeah, id probably still hit it.
Vlyrock
02-17-2007, 08:41 PM
^
|
I hope you meant 18. :)
BAGGIO
02-17-2007, 09:47 PM
i said what i said
CaliHornia
02-17-2007, 10:21 PM
dam, she looks like **** in this pic. what a waste of a perfectly good piece of tail (a few years back that is). sad to see people just self-destruct, especially when that person used to be a hot beeeeyotch.
http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2007/startracks/070226/britney_bald4_300.jpg
Man, her stomach looks really bad there. She's getting really f*cked up looking.
Weird thing, and I would never have guessed it a few years ago, but the one of this bunch that's hottest right now (read "cleanest looking") is Christina Aguilera.
Married life must be good for you, because Simpson was hot back when, but she's getting nasty, too.
whitelightnin_23
02-17-2007, 10:31 PM
i said what i said
dude if you're talking about underage chit...that's f'd up...we don't need that talk around here...see you on dateline.
IF you weren't talking about that, please clarify, and quickly...
legelegel
02-17-2007, 10:39 PM
Play along with the joke, damnit!
:laugh: That's putting him in his place.
The Massacre
02-17-2007, 10:48 PM
dude if you're talking about underage chit...that's f'd up...we don't need that talk around here...see you on dateline.
IF you weren't talking about that, please clarify, and quickly...
i made comments that a couple of 17yr old chicks were hot back when i was 19-20yrs old, but that doesn't mean i was going to sleep with them. does that make me dateline material?
BAGGIO
02-17-2007, 10:56 PM
bull****. granted i am the same age as britney spear, if not younger, but when she first came out in that catholic school girl outfit im sure that im not the only one who was thinking dirty about her.
whitelightnin_23
02-17-2007, 11:01 PM
i made comments that a couple of 17yr old chicks were hot back when i was 19-20yrs old, but that doesn't mean i was going to sleep with them. does that make me dateline material?
alright, I'll break down my logic for you...
let's look @ the posts:
ahhh i wish she could say 16 forever. Yeah, id probably still hit it.alright, I'll give you that this one is a little ambiguous as to the intent...does he mean he'd have sex w/ 16 yo Brit? Is he saying he'd do it w/ Brit now? who knows? which brings us to the next post by Vly:
I hope you meant 18. :)giving him a chance to redeem himself. he responds:
i said what i saidoffering NO clarification of the above post I post the following:
dude if you're talking about underage chit...that's f'd up...we don't need that talk around here...see you on dateline.
IF you weren't talking about that, please clarify, and quickly...AGAIN giving him an out...IF he is talking about having sex w/ someone underage (albeit, a fantasy)...that's f-d up in my opinion...ESPECIALLY given his age (previously I believe he's mentioned he's older). 16 is a kid...and having a daughter, it pisses me off to hear such from an older person...but I'm not sure that's what he meant...so I'm reserving judgment.
now, to your comment Tro...if you make comments on 17 year olds saying they are beautiful...I wouldn't say that is "dateline material"...especially given that you may be one or two years older than them...now being a much older person & saying you would like to have sex w/ someone underage...THAT pisses me off & YES, I believe that is "Dateline material"...or at the very least that state of mind.
LET ME BE CLEAR...I am NOT throwing stones @ Army...just asking him to clarify & HOPE he's not implying what I think he is implying...
Any more questions?
BAGGIO
02-17-2007, 11:06 PM
hahaha wow. my first comment was about bald britney, secondly, i think i was 14 when she was 16, i know i was in middle school.
whitelightnin_23
02-17-2007, 11:16 PM
hahaha wow. my first comment was about bald britney, secondly, i think i was 14 when she was 16, i know i was in middle school.
alright good.
if you'd like to do the bald b...carry on. I'm sure you'd have a chance right now (might want to see which rehab facility she'll check into next) & I hear crazy chicks are the best in bed ;)
second part...thanks for the clarification...that's all I was asking for.
maybe I'm just a little sensitive to the "child predator" & underage stuff since I now have a little girl...
carry on...
The Massacre
02-17-2007, 11:16 PM
alright, I'll break down my logic for you...
let's look @ the posts:
alright, I'll give you that this one is a little ambibuous as to the intent...does he mean he'd have sex w/ 16 yo Brit? Is he saying he'd do it w/ Brit now? who knows? which brings us to the next post by Vly:
giving him a chance to redeem himself. he responds:
offering NO clarification of the above post I post the following:
AGAIN giving him an out...IF he is talking about having sex w/ someone underage (albeit, a fantasy)...that's f-d up in my opinion...ESPECIALLY given his age (previously I believe he's mentioned he's older). 16 is a kid...and having a daughter, it pisses me off to hear such from an older person...but I'm not sure that's what he meant...so I'm reserving judgment.
now, to your comment Tro...if you make comments on 17 year olds saying they are beautiful...I wouldn't say that is "dateline material"...especially given that you may be one or two years older than them...now being a much older person & saying you would like to have sex w/ someone underage...THAT pisses me off & YES, I believe that is "Dateline material"...or at the very least that state of mind.
LET ME BE CLEAR...I am NOT throwing stones @ Army...just asking him to clarify & HOPE he's not implying what I think he is implying...
Any more questions?
don't start throwing stones at me dude. i wasn't defending Army, i was asking a question. his original comment said nothing about having sex with 16 yr old girls. the 2 comments he made on that 1 post were separated by a period, i think, and obviously 2 separate thoughts. i doubt very seriously that he needs to explain his comment simply because you misinterpreted it. it seemed fairly clear what he was saying to me.
also, i didn't say i made comments about 17 yrs olds saying they were beautiful, i said i said they were HOT. but i made those comments when i was 19-20, not now. i am a little older than 20 right now, i can assure you that. ship me to dateline if i can't be 19 and say a 17 yr old girl is HOT. hell, ship me to dateline if i can't be 20 and say a 17 yr old girl is HOT.
legelegel
02-17-2007, 11:18 PM
alright good.
if you'd like to do the bald b...carry on. I'm sure you'd have a chance right now (might want to see which rehab facility she'll check into next) & I hear crazy chicks are the best in bed ;)
second part...thanks for the clarification...that's all I was asking for.
maybe I'm just a little sensitive to the "child predator" & underage stuff since I now have a little girl...
carry on...
:)
whitelightnin_23
02-17-2007, 11:19 PM
don't start throwing stones at me dude. i wasn't defending Army, i was asking a question. his original comment said nothing about having sex with 16 yr old girls. the 2 comments he made on that 1 post were separated by a period, i think, and obviously 2 separate thoughts. i doubt very seriously that he needs to explain his comment simply because you misinterpreted it. it seemed fairly clear what he was saying to me.
also, i didn't say i made comments about 17 yrs olds saying they were beautiful, i said i said they were HOT. but i made those comments when i was 19-20, not now. i am a little older than 20 right now, i can assure you that.
show me where I'm throwing stones & you...
I'm glad you found Army's post to be perfectly clear...:gig:
The Massacre
02-17-2007, 11:20 PM
i said "don't start throwing"
i didn't say "stop throwing"
whitelightnin_23
02-17-2007, 11:22 PM
i said "don't start throwing"
i didn't say "stop throwing"
ok...show me where I "started throwing" stones @ you...
you weren't the one w/ the ambiguous post...
The Massacre
02-17-2007, 11:25 PM
i said "dont start throwing" because it looked like your post was heading that direction.
if you had already started to throw them, i would have to say "stop throwing" them.
whitelightnin_23
02-17-2007, 11:28 PM
i said "dont start throwing" because it looked like your post was heading that direction.
if you had already started to throw them, i would have to say "stop throwing" them.
alrighty then...no stones thrown...
you're overdue for a hotties thread btw (over 18 of course :gig:). Your 5000 just passed.
BAGGIO
02-17-2007, 11:29 PM
ps i think the dateline to catch a predator thing is the greatest thing on telivision. Especially since predator can turn invisible.
whitelightnin_23
02-17-2007, 11:32 PM
ps i think the dateline to catch a predator thing is the greatest thing on telivision. Especially since predator can turn invisible.
i agree...but ever since I have a daughter...it just pisses me off to see people like that out there. I'm not sure (and I'd be afraid to know) what I'd do if I caught a "predator".
second part - I think they should have Ahh-nold guest star on one of those in all his predator killing getup. It'd be awesome for sweeps week.
Burnetaggie99
02-18-2007, 01:24 PM
:wow: :throwup:
CaliHornia
02-18-2007, 01:46 PM
Interesting turn this thread took.
The reality is that the age of consent in this country is what it is because a particular legislature in a particular state says it is what it is and not because there's any right age. In some states it's 17. I think in others it is younger.
A number of younger hollywood stars routinely have "countdown to consent" clocks run.
I think actually, older people tend to look on the age of consent thing as less meaningful because people grew up faster way back when. Also interesting, I've noticed in movies and television (I'm thinking of episodes of MASH and Annie Hall) the actors spoke freely and without any kind of stigma about sex with girls as young as 16.
I certainly don't condone it, but I find it fascinating and completely undeniable that society's views on this have changed quite a bit the last 15-20 years or so.
I'll tell you now, WL--when your daughter is 18-19 you're not going to feel any better about guys looking at her. You're always going to be her dad and there's not going to be some magical age (at least not at that stage of her life) where you're going to feel differently about this sort of thing.
macduff93
02-18-2007, 01:56 PM
maybe I'm just a little sensitive to the "child predator" & underage stuff since I now have a little girl...
I was the same way with my stepsons, Monkey Boy. It's natural for us to want to protect our children's innocence.
Pray you never get called for Gran Jury duty. The things you will hear and read about the prevalence of child molestation and other related disregard for their welfare by their own families will make you physically ill.
Children in the great old USA are exploited and treated as disposable on a grander scale than you realize. As much as we don't want to know about it doesn't change the fact that it's real.:sad:
whitelightnin_23
02-18-2007, 05:19 PM
I was the same way with my stepsons, Monkey Boy. It's natural for us to want to protect our children's innocence.
Pray you never get called for Gran Jury duty. The things you will hear and read about the prevalence of child molestation and other related disregard for their welfare by their own families will make you physically ill.
Children in the great old USA are exploited and treated as disposable on a grander scale than you realize. As much as we don't want to know about it doesn't change the fact that it's real.:sad:
I agree... so it's another "hot topic" w/ me...along w/ concussions.
So, if it seems like I have a quick trigger on this one, I do. I'm not "casting stones" just wanted clarification. We're all good here :gig:.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.