I don't get it.

[KCAggie]

ESPN has us ranked 14 http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/recruiting/columns/story?columnist=luginbill_tom&id=2754877

Rivals has us ranked 41 http://www.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?Year=2007&Page=2&Type=0&Sort=0

and Scout has us ranked 26 http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9&c=14&yr=2007

[She_Hate_Me]

Inexact science. 26 is probably the most accurate. That is about what you get if you rank us by our average stars.

[Pflugerville Ag]

I was about to post the same thing KC. It just shows how noone really knows how good these high school kids are going to be. It also proves the Rivals bias that we talk so much about that the sips refuse to believe.

[Pumchavas28]

I was about to post the same thing KC. It just shows how noone really knows how good these high school kids are going to be. It also proves the Rivals bias that we talk so much about that the sips refuse to believe.


:rep: BINGO....... That & A lot of Ags seem to Jump of Cliffs when they see Rivals rankings... but will ignore Scouts & ESPN.... :rolleyes:

[Pflugerville Ag]

Alot of the other recruting sites do not just look at star ranking, but also individual team's needs and how they addressed them.

[CaliHornia]

I was about to post the same thing KC. It just shows how noone really knows how good these high school kids are going to be. It also proves the Rivals bias that we talk so much about that the sips refuse to believe.

Didn't rivals knock a star off of Chiles...?:huh:

[CaliHornia]

By the way, one obvious difference in scout and rivals is that scout appears to be counting the kicker you brought in who has played already if I'm not mistaken...so they have a larger class because of that guy.

And it looks like Scout has some other additional guys. So your overall point total went up there.

[polish]

The kicker is the only guy added. I didn't realize a 3 star kicker could move you 15 spots

[Pflugerville Ag]

The kicker is the only guy added. I didn't realize a 3 star kicker could move you 15 spots

:D