View Full Version : If you could trade.....
Gravy
11-20-2006, 01:11 AM
If you could trade any of our losses with any of our wins, would you trade any of them, and if so which one(s)?
I think I would trade all 3 losses for any of the away game wins....At least it would be a start in making Kyle feared again. Then again...maybe trading the losses for 3 of the non-conference wins would be the better choice.....hmmmmm
hmiles619
11-20-2006, 02:44 AM
i'd trade all of our non-conference wins for conference wins
GregH
11-20-2006, 06:15 AM
That's a hard question.
GuatemalanAg
11-20-2006, 08:21 AM
A hard question indeed...
Pflugerville Ag
11-20-2006, 10:58 AM
Great question Gravy. :rep:
I don't know how to answer it though.
TwelfthAG
11-20-2006, 11:02 AM
I'll trade all of our losses for wins. :D
I'd give up the wins at ulala, citadel and army(mean nothing) for tche, OU and NU...no question...wins that mean something over wins that mean nothing in the conference standings
Pumchavas28
11-20-2006, 01:12 PM
I'd give up the wins at ulala, citadel and army(mean nothing) for tche, OU and NU...no question...wins that mean something over wins that mean nothing in the conference standings
I don't know which I would trade or if I would at all.... but I couldn't trade our losses for those wins.....
What would hurt more? Losses to ulala & citadel at Kyle or the losses to OU & NU at Kyle...
A loss is a loss, but a loss to any of our OOC opponents would have been far worst than our Conference opponents beating us.
Pumchavas28
11-20-2006, 01:12 PM
Although... if we trade in our Conference losses... the we are undefeated in Conference & have a shot at the Big 12 Chip....
That's tough...
PinetarAg
11-20-2006, 01:42 PM
I'd give up the wins at ulala, citadel and army(mean nothing) for tche, OU and NU...no question...wins that mean something over wins that mean nothing in the conference standings
So then everyone would be b*tc*ing and moaning that we lost to those schools and we should NEVER lose to them...Its a lot harder than that becasue you want quality wins but do not want to be embarrassed by teams you are expected to beat
Pumchavas28
11-20-2006, 01:52 PM
So then everyone would be b*tc*ing and moaning that we lost to those schools and we should NEVER lose to them...Its a lot harder than that becasue you want quality wins but do not want to be embarrassed by teams you are expected to beat
Especially at home.
GSZ94
11-20-2006, 07:01 PM
So then everyone would be b*tc*ing and moaning that we lost to those schools and we should NEVER lose to them...Its a lot harder than that becasue you want quality wins but do not want to be embarrassed by teams you are expected to beat
Exactly....
This is why I wouldn't trade any of them!
However, if we could only move points from one game to another...:cool:
So then everyone would be b*tc*ing and moaning that we lost to those schools and we should NEVER lose to them...Its a lot harder than that becasue you want quality wins but do not want to be embarrassed by teams you are expected to beat
True! However, the issue is "would you trade" losses for wins...You have to trade the non-con wins for conference losses to win the Big 12 South and get to the title game and on to the BCS...Plus, if we would have won all of the Big 12 games in succession, just think of the MO we'd have going into the Championship game!
maybe I'm missing the issue? My way we go to the Big 12 Champ game as Big 12 South #1, and without them and a loss at tu, we go to the Holiday bowl?
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.